In anii '70 Stanley Byers a descoperit cea mai directa si mai devastatoare demonstratie a greselilor/erorilor fundamentale inerente in asa numita lege de atractie universala: paradoxul fortelor duble ale atractiei gravitationale.
Argumentul este extrem de usor de urmarit si in acelasi timp fascinant.
Avem doua barci pe un lac, barca x si barca y, nemiscate, fiind unite printr-o simpla franghie.
Persoana din barca x va trage de franghie, care este atasata barcii y.
Deci, barca x va incepe sa se miste/deplaseze catre barca y, si barca y se va deplasa catre barca x.
NU ESTE POSIBIL ca barca x sa ramana nemiscata si in acelasi timp sa fie si sursa fortei aplicata.
Unul dintre textele clasice de mecanica explica acelasi lucru:
"This example may help visualize the double force issue.
Let there be two rafts ( x and y ) freely floating on a clear calm lake with a rope between them.
Both rafts are still and are a rope length apart.
The man on (raft x) pulls on the rope which is attached to raft y.
Raft x will move toward raft y,… and raft y will move toward raft x.
Both rafts will receive equal and opposite force and motion.
It is not possible for (raft x) to remain still and be the source of the force."
EXACT ACELASI LUCRU SE VA INTAMPLA SI IN CAZUL IN CARE VOM APLICA LEGEA DE ATRACTIE GRAVITATIONALA PENTRU SISTEMUL FORMAT DIN PAMANT SI LUNA.
FOUR FORCES ACTING ON THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM.
Earth attracts the Moon, BUT ALSO an equal Earth anchored “attraction” force is pulling the Earth toward the Moon.
The Moon attracts the Earth, BUT ALSO this Moon seated force is equally pulling the Moon toward the Earth.
Pamantul va atrage Luna, DAR IN ACELASI TIMP si forta de atractie inerenta Pamantului va trage/deplasa Pamantul catre Luna.
Luna va atrage Pamantul, dar in acelasi timp si forta care izvoraste din Luna, de atractie, va trage/deplasa Luna catre Pamant.
INTOTDEAUNA VOR EXISTA PATRU FORTE IN ORICE SISTEM ASUPRA CARUIA APLICAM LEGEA DE ATRACTIE GRAVITATIONALA, FORMAT DIN DOUA CORPURI:
The Double Forces of Attractive Gravitation puts an end to the absurdity of the "law" of attractive gravity.
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE FOUR FORCES AT WORK.
Within the "attraction" concepts:
From Earth, the concept requires that Earth's gravity is attracting the Moon; and an equal Earth anchored “attraction” force is pulling the Earth toward the Moon.
From the Moon, the Moon's gravity is attracting the Earth; and this Moon seated force is equally pulling the Moon toward the Earth.
FOUR FORCES ACTING ON THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM.
Earth attracts the Moon, BUT ALSO an equal Earth anchored “attraction” force is pulling the Earth toward the Moon.
The Moon attracts the Earth, BUT ALSO this Moon seated force is equally pulling the Moon toward the Earth.
Pentru fizicienii contemporani, forta gravitationala este similara unei franghii (string) care uneste Pamantul cu Luna.
When science teachers are asked how does gravity work, they answer in this manner:
Gravity is a force.
Gravity is directed towards the center of the orbit i.e. the sun.
That makes gravity the centripetal force.
Imagine a ball attached to a string and you are holding the other end of the string and moving your hand in such a way that the ball is in circular motion. Then tension in the string is centripetal force.
Now, ball = earth
you = sun
tension in the string = gravity
Gravity is the reason one object orbits another. An analogy is swinging a ball on a string over your head. The string is like gravity, and it keeps the ball in orbit. If you let go of the string, the ball flies away from you. (Dr. Eric Christian, April 2011)
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=4569 (UCSB Science Line)
Centrifugal force acts on a rotating object in a direction opposite the axis of rotation. Imagine that you have a tennis ball tied to a string. If you swing the tennis ball on the string around in a circle, you would feel the ball tugging on the string. That is the centrifugal force on the ball. It is counteracted by tension in the string that you are holding. In this example, the tension force in the string is like the gravitational force between the earth and the sun. The ball doesn't get closer or farther from your hand. If you suddenly cut the string, the ball would go flying away, but that wont happen to the earth because of the sun's gravity.
http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=4583
Forces can make something move or stop something from moving. For a planet in orbit around the sun, the string is invisible. That invisible string is the gravitational force between the Earth and the sun.
Si atunci ajungem imediat la paradoxul fortelor duble ale atractiei gravitationale.
Then, the Mass Attraction and General Relativity Attraction concepts are not viable models for the cause of gravity and inertia.
Applying any "attractive" force model to the Earth Moon dynamic forces, we obtain this system:
The Earth’s attractive gravitation balances the orbital centrifugal force of the Moon.
The Moon’s attractive gravitation balances the orbital centrifugal force of the Earth.
At first this may seem like an orderly and balanced attractive force system; however,... the following paradox exists. If the seat, source and cause of the "apparent" attraction forces are "internal" to each of the bodies...the attraction concept produces twice the force that is necessary to balance the centrifugal orbital forces of a planet moon system. The concept of "attraction" between bodies requires that the force “from” each separate body acts on the remote body,-- and equally on the originating body. Another example of a balanced system is a rope under tension; each end has an equal amount of opposing force. As noted by Newton's third law of motion, " To every action there is always an opposed equal reaction".
This double force paradox is directly applicable to the "mass attraction",... the General Relativity “attraction” and all other attraction type concepts of gravity.
This example may help visualize the double force issue.
Let there be two rafts ( x and y ) freely floating on a clear calm lake with a rope between them.
Both rafts are still and are a rope length apart.
The man on (raft x) pulls on the rope which is attached to raft y.
Raft x will move toward raft y,… and raft y will move toward raft x.
Both rafts will receive equal and opposite force and motion.
It is not possible for (raft x) to remain still and be the source of the force.
The Mass Attraction Models of Gravitation
The attraction concepts accept Newton's inverse square equation of gravity's force between two bodies as:
F = G x (M1 x M2) / r squared .
The surface gravity (g) for each of the bodies can be derived from the gravitational constant (G) and the mass and radius of the bodies. Using Newton's equation the g forces, allegedly "seated" in each of the "two" bodies acting on the other at a distance, can be calculated.
Within the "attraction" concepts:
From Earth, the concept requires that Earth's gravity is attracting the Moon; and an equal Earth anchored “attraction” force is pulling the Earth toward the Moon.
From the Moon, the Moon's gravity is attracting the Earth; and this Moon seated force is equally pulling the Moon toward the Earth.
Using: 1 ) Newton’s equation as given above, 2 ) basic arithmetic, 3 ) common logic and 4 ) the mechanics of force, it is shown that the assumed Earth and Moon seated forces are equal; and as a result;…"all attraction models" produce twice the force that is required to balance the centrifugal forces of orbit!
The General Relativity Model of Gravitation
The exact same paradox arises with the General Relativity (GR) concept of gravity. It postulates that Mass warps a hypothetical "fabric of spacetime" and the warped fabric of spacetime causes “attraction” of other masses. Since in the GR theory the seat of the attractive force is anchored within the center of the planet’s and moon’s positions, we would again have twice the force required to balance the orbital forces of the Earth Moon system.
Stanley V. Byers
Cea mai directa si devastatoare dovada a faptului ca asa numita lege de atractie gravitationala este o bataie de joc la adresa stiintei.
Oare acesta sa fi fost adevaratul motiv pentru care Newton a scris urmatorul pasaj?
O scrisoare catre Bentley: Ca gravitatia sa fie un concept innascut, inerent si apartinand in mod esential materiei, astfel incat un corp sa actioneze asupra altui corp la distanta prin vid, fara alt intermediu, cu ajutorul caruia si prin care actiunea si fortele acestor corpuri sa fie transmise,
ar fi un concept atat de extraordinar de absurd incat sunt de parere ca nici un om, care gandeste intr-un mod rational in ceea ce priveste notiunile filosofice, nu ar putea sa ajunga la o asemenea concluzie.
Detaliile complete ale paradoxului fortelor duble ale atractiei gravitationale:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1723400
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... msg1724215
Efectul Biefeld-Brown, experimente efectuate in vid, care anuleaza imediat legea de atractie universala:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... #msg759935
Norii de pe cer sfideaza total si absolut legea de atractie universala:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/for ... #msg759968